I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). Perhaps it's not a big thing, but for a L-graded lens this feature should be expected. For that I would investigate alternatives just to make sure. I read and bought it. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. There is no such thing, in my opinion. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. The reason the 135mm lens was that it was the longest lens that would focus with a Leica rangefinder. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. I had of course heard that this lens is supposed to be very sharp, but I had never before had such a full blown "wow" experience when reviewing the sharpness of a lens. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. Does the bright star reflection bother you? Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? Unfortunately I haven't more the Canon lens. Whats the best camera for around $2000? Andysea, those are great images on your website. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? Its nice to have the F/2. Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? Orion's Belt : r/astrophotography - reddit.com So I feel I'm being cheated. This gives me the power of 162x, which is barely sufficient for my 420mm fl APO astrograph at full camera resolution. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. It's bokeh is comparable to the 85mm 1.2 but IMO not as nice. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . Touching the telescope, even ever so slightly, will introduce vibrations which will ruin the photograph. The latter are designed for crop sensor cameras and the back of the lens sticks too far into the body of the camera and would hit the EOS-clip filter. In fact, it might be fun to try! I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. Some APOs can be fitted with pricey telecompressors, but those invariably result in vignetting and coma. I wanted to add my experience with some lenses that I thought worthy of being considered too, and some of the equipment that I have used. However, I find the process tedious, and prefer single, manually guided, long exposures which seem to have deeper colors. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. i too use the 135mm nikkor[ with a MB speed booster on fuji x for outstanding separation], also a samyang 85 mm 1.4 nikon mt with speedbooster also gives excellent separation, yes, I think I have read that the old Nikkor 135mm f3.5 was even sharper than the f2.8. I got this lens because of portraiture. The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. Samyang 135 f/2 ED astrophotography modifications - astrojolo https://www.dpreview.com/news/7777572944/video-using-the-5-700-canon-200mm-f2-on-the-new-sony-a7r-iii, DPReview TV: We share our 2021 predictions while freezing our asses off, Video: Here's how Adobe Lightroom Mobile works on the Zeiss ZX1, DPReview TV: How to set up Sony's 'Real-Time' autofocus tracking, 7Artisans releases a $195 35mm F5.6 golden pancake lens for Leica M mount cameras, OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Can I assume that this article applies only to full frame & not to micro four thirds? My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Available Monday. This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. IS is useful in my f/4 zooms but I don't need it to hand-hold this lens. You might never need another lens in the overlapping range at 135mm there isn't much difference between the separation afforded by f/2 vs f/2.8, and the latest 70-200s are plenty sharp. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 was Built for Astrophotography (Suggesting that diffraction limiting is only part of the story with lens softness at tiny apertures.). Light weight and robust. Yes, there is some sharpness added when stopping down to f4 or f5.6 but after that it doesn't get better. Super sharp and renders beautiful creamy bokeh. I would like to make this work with the Nikkor 180mm ED (i.e., what I have versus what I cannot havelol). Must have if you're serious about portraits. Some people like these, and consider them decorative. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. Bye MCovington, my Zeiss 300/4 is the full thickness barrel version, made in West Germany, serial number 5990836. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. $399 00. The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. Smooth but contrasty. It is NOT extremely sharp wide open, it often requires massive AF adjustment on DLSRs (sometimes beyond what the body allows as micro-adjustment) and AF is not reliable enough to consistently ensure sharp focus at full aperture. Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. I've done comparisons between my brand-new Samyang 85/1.4 and the old big Apollo 135/1.8 lens I had lying around, and the shots were for all practical purposes identical (exept, obviously, for the pixel count once cropped). Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. Otherwise I might not achieve focus? Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. At $900 US it a relative steal. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. I would love to see his test images. Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. Amazon.com: Customer reviews: Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED UMC Telephoto Lens Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. - in my subjects' skin. The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion (ED) lens element to control chromatic aberration, and ultra multi-coatings (UMC) to both improve light transmission and reduce flare. Make sure to select your camera mount when checking the price (Check current price). Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. With no general agreement about what Bokeh is it is little wonder that there is so much argument and disagreement. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. Find out what happens when Chris shoots some very expired APS film using old Canon and Nikon cameras. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. The background blur is amazingly creamy with this lens. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. This is a very popular lens, and I am sure there are a ton of lens test reports for it available online. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. p.s. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. It's a technical review about a couple of lens attributes. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. Big F-value.Light. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy.
Upcoming Funerals At Worthing Crematorium, Hard Seltzer Without Stevia, Columbia Shuttle Autopsy Photos, Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney Studio Old Westbury, Quantum Health Prior Authorization List, Articles C